1-800-826-6174
Price Protection Guarantee
90 Day Return Policy
10-Point Inspection Process
12-Month Warranty
FT-iZ Fairway Woods
5.00
207
Read / Write Reviews
The FT-iZ Fairway Woods continue Callaway's legacy of technology-leading fairway woods. Every shot has unprecedented feel consistency stability and distance.
Free Headcover
Wood & Hybrid PurchasesWhy Buy Certified Pre-Owned?
You May Also Like
Features & Benefits
The FT-iZ Fairway Woods continue Callaway’s legacy of technology-leading fairway woods. Every shot has unprecedented feel, consistency, stability, and distance.
- Localized Polar Weighting at the front and back of the driver for a heavy face and in-line rear power source.
- Excess material is removed from the Chemically Milled Hyperbolic Face Cup by a chemical reduction process.
- The progressive shape of the Aerodynamic Body Design makes this our most efficient high inertia clubhead.
- Fusion®: Cast steel, formed aluminum, compression cured carbon fiber, and cast titanium create extreme weight placement.
FT-iZ Fairway Woods is rated
out of
5 by
207.
Rated 5 out of
5
by
DallyLama from
3 wood, 15 degree, regular graphic shaft.
This thing is nice. Easy to hit, and I hit it straight. Usually I hit a draw but no, straight.....................and long. My other 3w I hit about 225. This one 240. Low ball flight (titleliest velocity) and how it rolls. I started picking on the other guy using a TM rocketballz 3w. Went right past him. And the callaway used site, perfect as usual. And what a deal. These were going for 129 at the golf store. I got it for just about 1/2 shipped right to my door. One tiny scratch on the underside of the head. So what.
I would suggest that if you are not a monster swinger, get the reg shaft. I could see the stiff being a problem for me and most.
Date published: 2013-03-12
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Hclanton from
Best fairway wood purchase ever!
Bought 3 wood with standard stiff shaft and 5 wood with Matrix xcon shaft. love them both. longer than my taylormade by far. Love trajectory and predictable flight and accuracy.
Date published: 2011-12-29
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Walk'g Sr Golfer 67 anni, 67 from
FT-IZ 7w, Light Flex shaft
Distance ranges from 160 (poor shoulder turn) to 200+ yds and club is very straight unless intended to be hooked/drawn or sliced/faded. Club appearance at set-up encourages good swings -- seems lighter than previous FT-7w and easier to square at impact. Playing FTiz3w+ w/ 60g S-shaft (almost as long as driver and more consistent = 195-220+ yds w/ roll) and FTiz5w (w/ 60g R-shaft =185-200 yds). Still learning to hit club longer. Driver: FTiz 9.5 w/ 60g S-shaft. Irons in bag: Fusion light flex 8,9,W,AW,& SW + LW-60X.
Date published: 2011-12-08
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Andy from
Best Callaway I have had yet!
This hits better than my Big Bertha. It is the best driver I have used since I got my Wilson X-31's. It is light but hits solid, and is more consistently straight off the tee. My distance is probably 10% improved. I have gone ahead to get the 3 & 5 woods, an I am considering the irons too.
Date published: 2011-10-29
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Marian from
LONGER AND STRAIGHTER
the FTiZ woods have made my game fun again. Their flexibility helps to compensate for my lack of it at 84 years old.
Date published: 2011-10-19
Rated 5 out of
5
by
nitro from
I would buy this product again and again
Great for reaching the par 5's in two!!
Date published: 2011-07-28
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Tommy 3-putt from
Game changing
I had steelhead 3 and 5 woods.....upgraded to FTIz 3 and 5...Difference is night and day..Everyone is looking to save money these days...Callaway Pre-owned is the way to go ....now looking to upgrade driver from FT-5 to FTIz driver.
Date published: 2011-07-28
Rated 4 out of
5
by
MDM from
Nice upgrade from my old woods.
Bought these without hitting them since I had the IZ driver and loved it. I'm not the greatest golfer by any means and probably need some more practice with it, but I was hoping these would be a little easier to hit. When you do hit them well the ball does fly. Once again this is probably all due to operator error.
Date published: 2011-07-27